Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Swiber Holdings

Swiber Holdings Limited, through its subsidiaries, offers integrated offshore engineering, procurement, construction, installation, and commission (EPCIC) services to oil and gas companies. Its services include launching and/or installation of jackets in an offshore production platform at offshore production sites; engineering design and laying of offshore pipelines; Engineering design and mooring of FSOs and FPSOs on the seabed; engineering design, fabrication, and installation of single point mooring buoys; and maintenance, servicing and refurbishment of existing single point mooring buoys and their mooring systems. The company also offers a range of offshore marine engineering services, as well as owns and charters vessels. As of February 28, 2007, it operated a fleet of 13 operating vessels, comprising six tug boats and seven barges. Swiber Holdings Limited has operations primarily in Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia, as well as in Thailand, India, China, Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The company was founded in 1996 and is based in Singapore.

Strategy Overview

The fortunes of oil services companies are tied to overall supply and demand issues as well as to prices. Not coincidentally, based on these factors the oil industry has experienced several cycles over the years. Changes in oil prices have different effects on different sectors. For example, while high oil prices benefit upstream exploration and production companies, they hurt down-stream refiners and marketers in the form of higher raw materials costs. Conversely, lower oil prices help refiners and marketers while hurting producers’ earnings. Integrated oil companies realize both sides of oil price fluctuations, but they generally benefit from higher oil prices, as they are usually more leveraged to the upstream. Swiber’s position in the upstream section of the value chain means that it has benefited from the recent surge in global oil prices.


For oil drilling & exploration services companies, the location of their operations is of prime importance. At any given time, some geographic areas might be experiencing a surge in drilling activity, while activity in other areas may be stagnant or declining. Offshore areas that have been leading the resurgence in offshore drilling over the past three years include the Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea, Southeast Asia, and West Africa; drilling contractors are paid more for their work in these areas than elsewhere.

Swiber’s Performance

Swiber’s operations are focused in Indonesia & Malaysia, which have seen a healthy growth in offshore exploration & production operations in recent years. The company has been on a rapid growth trajectory over the last two years, with revenues and net profits following a parabolic upward trajectory.

Accordingly, the stock price has also risen meteorically since its listing, hitting a high of about $3.50 late in 2007. However, the recent dip in the stock markets and bloodletting has seen Swiber’s stock price follow the general market trends and dip accordingly:

Recent Developments

Musicwhiz is a current shareholder of Swiber and has been faithfully keeping up with the company. He has written very detailed and insightful analysis of the company’s strategy going forward so I shall refrain from my own analysis and refer you to his blog.

Valuation

I have done a simple valuation using the abnormal earnings growth (AEG) model, so I have not forecast full balance sheets for this valuation.

The assumptions I have used for the valuation are as follows:

Which gives the following valuation (click for full image):

The valuation of $1.29 is still far below the recent traded price of about $2.20, and this may be because the revenue growth rates I have used, despite being quite aggressive relative to other companies, may be conservative.

In terms of relative multiples analysis:
The price appears to be about 17x FY08E earnings and about 6x book value.


Conclusions

By conventional standards, Swiber is not priced conservatively. The market appears to have assumed massive growth rates in the next few years as oil & gas offshore exploration activity continues to grow to meet global demand for oil and as onshore resources decline. High energy prices also mean strong margins for the exploration services companies and Swiber seems poised for benefit.


I personally would like to wait a while to see if the recent market shock will continue and if Swiber's share price will drop further as i like to have a better margin of safety.

Friday, December 21, 2007

Singapore's Population Statistics - The Rise of Foreign Talent

Singapore adopts an open immigration policy with a strong belief in attracting “foreign talent” to drive the country's economic growth. As shown below, this has contributed to a consistent growth in the number of non-residents in Singapore since 2003, rising from 748 million to about 1,005 million in 2007, for an annual growth rate of about 7.7%.


The % of the Singapore Population who are non-residents has also been on the rise, recently breaking through the 20% mark in 2007 to 21.48%.

At the current rate, the % of foreigners in Singapore looks set to rise significantly, as the country continues to import "foreign talent" - both cheap foreign labour and senior executives - to boost the population and to drive the country towards a knowledge-based economy, and target wealthy foreigners to grow its tourism, private banking and premium real estate businesses.

The % of foreigners in the country could easily rise to 25%, and even 30-35% in the coming years.

All statistics are publicly available from SingStat.

Friday, October 26, 2007

Two Videos on Private Equity

World Economic Forum Davos: The Globalization of Private Equity


Berkeley China Initiative: Private Equity in China

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Two Videos on Oil

Recently I wrote two posts on companies operating in China's Oil industry, China Oilfield Technology and RH Energy.

For those who are interested in this sector, below are two lengthy videos on the global oil industry: its business, economics, politics.

China vs US: The Battle for Oil (50mins)



Securing the International Oil Supply - Conference at Univ. of Chicago (1.5hrs)

Friday, October 12, 2007

Even Central Americans Want to Learn Mandarin

I previously blogged about the increasing importance of the Mandarin language, due to China's economic ascension. Now, even the people of Panama are considering making it compulsory for their children to learn Mandarin as a 3rd language.
Mandatory Mandarin lessons for Panama kids?

PANAMA CITY - LEARNING Mandarin could soon be compulsory for schoolchildren in Panama, in a bid to prepare the Spanish-speaking nation for China's growing importance as a trading partner.

Panama's National Assembly will next week debate a Bill to make Mandarin lessons obligatory in all government-run primary schools in the trade-dependent nation.

Mandarin is the official language of both China and Taiwan, and though Panama has no diplomatic relations with Beijing, China has major interests in its transport and shipping sectors.

Congressman Arturo Arauz, who drafted the proposal, said it would help prepare Panama for a 'new linguistic order' prompted by spectacular economic growth in China.

'We cannot ignore that a lot of our trade is with Asia,' he said. 'In 20 years' time, the world is going to be a very different place.'

Under the proposal, children aged between six and 11 would learn Mandarin for a trial period of 10 years.

English would continue to be taught in schools as a second language.

REUTERS

If you are Singaporean Chinese and you don't speak fluent Mandarin, you better start working on it!

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Temasek Watch: Indonesia Accuses Temasek Of Monopoly

Indonesia Accuses Temasek Of Monopoly

(RTTNews) - Singapore investment company Temasek Holdings has been accused of violating Indonesia's anti-monopoly laws through its subsidiaries' shareholdings in two of Indonesia's largest mobile telecommunication operators, according to the Singapore News.

Following a 120-day probe, Indonesia's Anti-Monopoly Commission (KPPU) issued a 109-page report that stated that Temasek subsidiaries Indosat and Telkomsel, which dominate Indonesia's mobile sector, represent a conflict of interest.

Temasek subsidiaries own a 42 percent stake in Indosat and a 35 percent stake in Telkomsel. A total of 10 companies compete for shares of the Indonesian market worth US$5 billion.

Temasek has denied the charges, replying that Indosat and Telkomsel both have their own boards and function independently.

The charges have been submitted to an independent council that will deliver a verdict next month.

Original source is here

Business Times - 10 Oct 2007

Temasek to defend against Indonesia's ruling

SINGAPORE - Singapore's state investment firm Temasek Holdings said on Wednesday that it would defend itself against the findings by Indonesia's anti-trust body KPPU that it had violated the country's anti-monopoly laws.

'Temasek Holdings will vigorously defend its legal rights at all opportunities and in all available legal forums. As legal counsel for Temasek Holdings, I will be seeking clarification from KPPU on this matter,' Temasek said in a statement to Reuters, quoting its lawyer Todung Mulya Lubis.

'The claims against Temasek Holdings are baseless and without merit,' the email said.

Singapore's state TV reported late on Tuesday that Indonesia's anti-monopoly body KPPU had found that Singapore's Temasek violated the country's anti-monopoly laws through its stakes in two Indonesian telecommunications firms.

For rest of story, click here (subscription may be required)

Intangible Asset Valuation: The Value of Female Beauty

I found the article below on one of my readers' blogs.

I think it is a very funny post that properly applies the principles of intangible asset valuation, including accelerating depreciation and present value.

It also discusses how to properly finance a rapidly depreciating intangible asset - leasing might be better than an outright acquisition.

Enjoy :)
----------------------------------------
THE QUESTION

What am I doing wrong?

Okay, I'm tired of beating around the bush. I'm a beautiful (spectacularly beautiful) 25 year old girl. I'm articulate and classy. I'm not from New York. I'm looking to get married to a guy who makes at least half a million a year. I know how that sounds, but keep in mind that a million a year is middle class in New York City, so I don't think I'm overreaching at all.

Are there any guys who make 500K or more on this board? Any wives? Could you send me some tips? I dated a business man who makes average around 200 - 250. But that's where I seem to hit a roadblock. 250,000 won't get me to central park west. I know a woman in my yoga class who was married to an investment banker and lives in Tribeca, and she's not as pretty as I am, nor is she a great genius. So what is she doing right? How do I get to her level?

Here are my questions specifically:

- Where do you single rich men hang out? Give me specifics- bars, restaurants, gyms

- What are you looking for in a mate? Be honest guys, you won't hurt my feelings

-Is there an age range I should be targeting (I'm 25)?

- Why are some of the women living lavish lifestyles on the upper east side so plain? I've seen really 'plain jane' boring types who have nothing to offer married to incredibly wealthy guys. I've seen drop
dead gorgeous girls in singles bars in the east village. What's the story there?

- Jobs I should look out for? Everyone knows - lawyer, investment banker, doctor. How much do those guys really make? And where do they hang out? Where do the hedge fund guys hang out?

- How you decide marriage vs. just a girlfriend? I am looking for MARRIAGE ONLY

Please hold your insults - I'm putting myself out there in an honest way. Most beautiful women are superficial; at least I'm being up front about it. I wouldn't be searching for these kind of guys if I wasn't able to match them - in looks, culture, sophistication, and keeping a nice home and hearth.

it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests
PostingID: 432279810

-----------------

THE ANSWER
Dear Pers-431649184:

I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament. Firstly, I'm not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year. That said here's how I see it.

Your offer, from the prospective of a guy like me, is plain and simple a crappy business deal. Here's why. Cutting through all the B.S., what you suggest is a simple trade: you bring your looks to the party and I bring my money. Fine, simple. But here's the rub, your looks will fade and my money will likely continue into perpetuity...in fact, it is very likely that my income increases but it is an absolute certainty that you won't be getting any more beautiful!

So, in economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning asset. Not only are you a depreciating asset, your depreciation accelerates! Let me explain, you're 25 now and will likely stay pretty hot for the next 5 years, but less so each year. Then the fade begins in earnest. By 35 stick a fork in you!

So in Wall Street terms, we would call you a trading position, not a buy and hold...hence the rub...marriage. It doesn't make good business sense to "buy you" (which is what you're asking) so I'd rather lease. In case you think I'm being cruel, I would say the following. If my money were to go away, so would you, so when your beauty fades I need an out. It's as simple as that. So a deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage.

Separately, I was taught early in my career about efficient markets. So, I wonder why a girl as "articulate, classy and spectacularly beautiful" as you has been unable to find your sugar daddy. I find it hard to believe that if you are as gorgeous as you say you are that the $500K hasn't found you, if not only for a tryout.

By the way, you could always find a way to make your own money and then we wouldn't need to have this difficult conversation.

With all that said, I must say you're going about it the right way. Classic "pump and dump." I hope this is helpful, and if you want to enter into some sort of lease, let me know.

Update: This article has made the world news on the BBC, and on the New York Times.